Honoring
Our Own Philanthropy

Did
you know?
- Charitable
donations to American Indian Tribes and Native American
Nonprofits have been less one percent
(1%) of the total given to all nonprofits. Current estimates range from 1/6th to 1/20th of 1% of all grants made annually from foundations
and corporate grantmakers nationwide.
- One in four Native Americans live at or below the poverty level in the United States.
- Native
American people represent at least 1.4% of U.S. population.
- Native Americans receive pennies to the dollars in comparison to all other groups from philanthropy annually.
- The Tribal Nations comprising "Indian Country" often give far more on a percentage or an actual basis to benefit their non-Native neighbor communities than they receive from mainstream charitable contributions for their programs.
- As an example, for every $1.00 that goes out from Indian Country to help Tribal neighbors often a penny or less is received to help Tribal people or their Tribal programs.
Tribal Philanthropy – Revenues, Assets & Resources Certification
A certification presented at the
National Indian Gaming Association's 2006 Trade Show in Albuquerque
Sponsored by ThreeHoops.com, Hopi Foundation and the Network For Good powered by Groundspring
For customized training on this topic Email Us
ThreeHoops.com and the Network for Good Powered by Groundspring Provide New Access to Online Charitable Donations for Tribes
Giving & Receiving in Indian Country
This interview with IRS Office of Indian Tribal Governments professionals makes clear the direct ways you can contribute your charitable donations to include Native Americans.
Tribal Nation Philanthropy Examples
Cherokee Nation Angel Tree, OK
Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community Donates $182,600 to Brighten Holidays, MN
Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community Donates $800,000 to Santee Sioux Nation, MN
Hopi Education Endowment Fund, AZ
Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community's Mystic Lake Employees Help Katrina Victims
Left to right: SMSC Secretary/Treasurer Keith Anderson, Environmental Services Heavy-Duty Custodian Gail Joplin, American Red Cross Donations Relations Manager Melanie Ewald, Little Six Casino Restaurant Cashier Jeannine Johannsen, SMSC Gaming Enterprise Chairman of the Board of Directors Steve Florez.
Mdewakanton Fire Department Celebrates One Year of Ambulance Service for Patients on the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community and Surrounding Areas, MN
Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community Supports Local Social Services Through Charitable Giving, MNMorongo Band of Mission Indians offers the Rodney T. Mathew Jr. Memorial Scholarship program open to any enrolled member of a California Indian tribe who is a full-time student at an accredited college or university and has a minimum GPA of 2.75, CA
SMSC Supports Cheyenne River Elderly Village, MN
Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community - 2004 Donation Report
Shakopee
Mdewakanton Sioux Community, MN
Shakopee
Mdewakanton Sioux Community 2004 Grantmaking nears $10
Million
SMSC
donates to Cheyenne River Youth Project
Shakopee
Mdewakanton Sioux Community's Mystic
Lake Casino & Hotel hosts
Northern Plains Native American Heart & Diabetes
Conference
The
Southern Ute Indian Tribe and
the Sky
Ute Casino: Local Nonprofits Share in $20K Gift, CO
Featured
Native American Foundation
The Hopi Foundation is a 2005 national finalist in the Ford Foundation's Leadership for a Changing World awards program.
The
Hopi Foundation
Mission:
Help People Help Themselves
"The
Hopi Foundation was founded in 1985 and incorporated
under the State of Arizona as a 501 (c) 3 non-profit
organization in 1987. Our basic mission is to Help People
Help Themselves. The Hopi name, Lomasumi'nangwtukwsiwmani,
signifies the process of furthering unity of aspiration
blossoming into full maturity over time. We believe
in attending to the community in which we live and in
the skills of our people."*
Barbara
Poley, Executive Director
Loris
Taylor, Associate Director
PO Box 169
Hotevilla, Arizona 86030
928-734-2380 Phone
928-734-9520 Fax
Or get more information direct by visiting The
Hopi Foundation online!
*reprinted
from Hopi Foundation's website with permission
Featured
Native American Scholarship Fund
United
South and Eastern Tribes' Scholarship Fund for Indian
Students
Thought on Inclusiveness
|
Dr.
Ricardo M. Millett |
Missing
Voices: A
Personal Perspective on Diversity in Program Evaluation
I. Perspective
My perspective on diversity and evaluation has been
a long time in the making. It combines
personal and professional experiences that go back to
early childhood; it is constantly sculpted
by the global events swirling around me. My personal
point of view was forged by my heritage,
as a person of color, and my experiences as an immigrant
to the United States. My education
and role as a professional evaluation practitioner with
one of the world’s largest foundations—
The W. K. Kellogg Foundation –-added depth and
detail to my professional views.
From my perspective, the consequences of missing voices
in evaluation are significant—
inappropriate outcomes and a lack of authentic data.
Remaining deaf to the voices of those we
wish to help causes evaluation to become a source of
power for the few – usually the racial and
economic majority – and anathema to all others.
We, program officers, evaluators, and funders,
have a responsibility to seek effective solutions to
social issues from as broad a perspective as
is humanly possible. We can commit to using evaluation
methodologies that embrace diversity
and to holding each other and ourselves accountable
for cultural competence. From my own
experiences I have learned the harmful effects of disregarding
minority views, program
participants and marginalized people.
II.
Experiences
Sometimes we inadvertently hurt the people we mean to
help. I know firsthand that members of
minority groups are often left out of the mainstream.
As a result, traditional program evaluation
methodology can deny or ignore the voices of the very
people who are participating in or being
impacted by our social programs. When outsiders evaluate
program outcomes without asking
for input from participants, they can interpret participants’
experiences inaccurately. The results
of those evaluations can be further marginalization...download
the rest of Dr. Millet's article
Last Updated: Jan 31 2007
|